For some people, and in some genres, whenever they have a spare moment, because research isn’t that important to getting things right in their stories, or because they already know the world they are writing in. Then there are writers like yours truly …

Frederick Jackson Turner published one book, and two major articles, all of which shaped the field of Western History to this day. He should have done a lot more, could have done a lot more, but there’s a reason why his publisher said that the publisher’s epitaph should be, “I Got a book out of Frederick Jackson Turner.” Turner researched. He researched to the point that he didn’t write, because he had to be completely certain that he had all the correct information. Given that he lived in the late 1800s, that was a challenge. When he died, he had huge amounts of research notes, probably sufficient for a dozen books at least. He had published one (1) book.

If he’d had the internet, he’d still be researching the first book, one suspects.

The lesson for historians is that at some point, just stop and write. Something will always be overlooked, or turn up later. But just write. This is also true for fiction writers. At some point, just stop and tell the story. Make up bits as you go, bits that fill in what you haven’t found yet, but write. The unwritten story doesn’t sell, can’t be told or read, isn’t really alive. Just write it.

I’ve mentioned that the current WIP stalled out because my hind brain realized I didn’t have enough to build the world properly, and the the plot I’d envisioned wouldn’t fit. I’d read politics, sort of, learned about the people called Picts, the “real” Merlyn as best ethnographers and historians can suss out, and had been in the area. However, that doesn’t build a world. So after doing other things, I latched onto a book recommended on a different blog, and from there discovered what I needed to learn to fill in the holes and create a believable character and setting.

This was very good. However, I had to stop at some point and write. For one, the unwritten book gathers no sales. For two, research books get expensive quickly [muttermutter university press prices muttermutter]. For three, I don’t care to be the Frederick Jackson Turner of the fiction world. The story needs to be written so I can get to other projects. For four, writing is stress relief and heaven knows I need some of that.*

The other thing, in this case, is that I’d run out of readily accessible general books. From this point on what remains are ever more specialized archaeological and linguistic studies, or, ah, somewhat inventive works that owe more to the author’s desired past than to the archaeology and few written sources. Yes, I could dig more deeply, read more monographs, research farther into the details of the place and time and times before, but … That takes money and time. Enough of both had been spent on research.

Rump firmly in chair, writing resumed. It is starting to flow, slowly but steadily, as I work what I learned into the plot and frame the world around Tuathal mab Bria, the master bard and half brother of one of the kings of DalRiada.

*Nothing major, aside from the H-ll Cold, which combined with allergies to leave me dragging for a week or so.

6 responses to “The Frederick Jackson Turner Problem: Or When Do you Stop Researching, Put Your Rump in the Chair, and Write?”

  1. “In any software project, the time always arrives to shoot the programmers and put the release out.” Most managers of my acquaintance are eager to reach that point….

  2. Hmmm, since Turner came first, I’d say Tolkien was the Frederick Jackson Turner of fantasy.

  3. The space regency I think is the only time I got seriously bogged down in research. There’s a notebook of mine from around 2023-2024 with a whole digest field guide to asteroids across ~ten pages (admittedly 5×7.25″).

  4. When I drafted two alt-history short stories last year, this drove me nuts. I enjoy research, but I usually can stop when I get enough info to write. After LibertyCon, I was paralyzed by the fear that I would write “something historically inaccurate” in my story. I saw some people gleefully tearing into alt-history writers for daring to “get it wrong.”

    It was a very unhealthy environment for me.

    Thank you for sharing this, Ms. Alma.

    1. You are very welcome. I had the same sense with my alt-history/secret history of WWI and the inter-war years. So I dug, extrapolated, and crossed my fingers that most readers’ unfamiliarity with the Eastern Front (plus the sci-fi part) would cover my errors. Thus far no one has screamed that I got things wrong.

      However, I did not go into technical detail of weapons. I know far better than to risk that. Readers will forgive horse shoes in the late Neolithic/Chalcolithic, but not making an error in the kind and caliber of an army’s firearms.

  5. I read a lot of history. Then I just write.

    Some people have sometimes accused me of showing off my research. sigh

Trending