Skip to content

Entanglements

This is a post I don’t know how to write, but which – yet – I feel needs to be written.  Last week I talked about whirlpools, and this is a particular form of whirlpool.  Not the only one, mind you, nor the worst.  Arguably the worst whirlpool on your way to bestseller status is the need for a roof over head and three squares a day.  It is the reason my husband – arguably a better writer – hasn’t made it there yet.  He’s better at the earning at a regular job thing, and therefore the designated bread earner.

But entanglements are a serious stumbling block for many writers and in fact I would say most writers have experienced at least some of them.  Like whirlpools they come from something that is beneficial, something that most writers need.

First let’s establish some facts about writers and writing.

The first fact about writers is that in the dark of night, in the privacy of our own heart, very few if any of us think we’re any good.  Recently a writer who is just slightly behind me on the path tried to justify his lack of doing something or other with “you see, I have no self confidence.”  At which point I stared at him and said “you talk as if I do.”

There might be one or two writers out there who really think they’re better than sliced bread with peanut butter.  I don’t know. It’s hard to tell because in public most of us put on a really good front, and some of us are REALLY good at it.  (Some of us, like yours truly suck.)  You see, sooner or later writers stumble on the fact people tend to believe what you tell them, and if you tell them your writing is better than doughnuts with plenty of jam, chances are you’ll sell better.

It doesn’t mean that inside you’re not a massive black hole of insecurity and doubt.  I’ve had bestselling friends – mega bestselling friends and legends of the field – tell me they’re as full of doubt as I am.

To make things better, there’s the writing life.  First, like what Heinlein says about the army in Glory Road, the writing life has two departments, the Fairy Godmother and the Practical Joke department.  Mostly you experience the second, but you hear about people who experience the first.

What I mean is, how many of us, writers or readers, have picked up a massive blockbuster, read the first ten pages and thought “If I picked this up out of slush, no power on Earth would induce me to continue reading?”

This was more so with the traditional publishing model when I came in.  It not only relied on push to make massive blockbusters, but it gave most midlist books negative push.  As in, it’s really hard for you to become known for your book, no matter how much the fairy godmother tries, if only five thousand copies were printed and most of those are in the warehouse, because pushing them was not a priority for anyone.  So there are two books on half the chain stores, for two weeks and after that no reorders and (at the end of this three years ago) no special orders unless paid in advance.  For a few of my books (the musketeer mysteries) even my friends looking for the d*mn things, and armed with the release date couldn’t find a copy.

However, even with indie – which seems inherently more meritocratic because no one is controlling your results – there is a Fairy Godmother department.  This is obvious when you look at the books that suddenly have mega sales.  You read them and you go “okay, they’re okay, but…”  But, they hit a book blogger on the right day.  They started buzz in the right place.  They were lucky.  The difference is in indie “decent” will sell a certain number, no matter what.  (Certain caveats apply: short stories sell much worse than novels.  Volume counts.  One short story out, no matter where, will barely sell.  But once you have six there’s an uptick.  Twelve, another uptick.  And so on.)

The truth is what seems to count most for making it in writing is persistence.  This applies to both traditional and indie publishing.  Keep plugging at it, multiply your efforts, try different things (even different genres if you’re capable) and learn.

But most of us don’t want that answer.  Most of us were raised on the talent myth.  Also, to some extent, as artists (bah, I hate the idea I’m one) to improve you need to believe that there’s an “objective” good to move towards. So the nagging question that comes to all our minds and wakes us screaming in the night is “Am I good enough?”

The worst afflicted by this were the traditional midlisters – tons of books out, tons of experience, no sales to speak of – and might now be the beginner indie.

We/they are terrified there’s something inherently wrong with us.  (There is.  In the old model, you failed to make enough politically correct noises to attract attention and identify yourself as one of the good people who deserved push; in the new model you haven’t written enough.)

This makes us vulnerable to entanglements.

The simplest entanglement is a writers’ group.  Somewhere in the archives here I have a post on writers groups – when they’re good and when they’re bad.  I’m not going to rehash it.  Let’s say when writers’ groups are good, they’re very very good.  When they’re bad… they’re terrible.

It all depends on how long they’ve been around and what they want out of the group.  I’ve belonged to groups where they’d been around forever; most of them had given up on ever being published; the writers’ group was an aim in itself.  The group both told them they were writers as a form of validation, and had become a sort of Café Klatch.  In practicality this meant that when you joined, the things they told you to change and the stuff they tried to teach you was not designed to make you more saleable but to make you FIT IN.  To make you like them.  I never stuck around very long because I’m mulish and I had the certainty of what my aim was.  If it seemed to me like I was hanging out on the bench with the losers, I moved on, no matter how much they told me their lack of success was because they were better than what was out there.

But even my favorite group – the one that lasted ten years and started with all of us as beginners – turned into an entanglement.  Oh, sure, some of the pressures were good: it was the only time in my life I wrote a short a week while also writing novels.  But I became dependent on it.  Without the group’s seal of approval, I couldn’t send stuff out.  The year after the group broke up, I couldn’t finish anything, and sometimes – looks at the pile of stuff to put out that’s edited and sitting on her desk – I still have trouble showing stuff to people because, well, the now long defunct group hasn’t seen it.

What applies to groups applies to people, too.  Most of us have one person they rely on.  For the longest time mine was Dan.  We sort of grew up in writing together and who are you going to trust if not your spouse?

But then I found myself going in directions he clearly hated, or thought were “just wrong” based on where he was and I was.  I persisted, nonetheless, and eventually it worked for me.  And he now has no problem with those books, and denies his first reaction to them was “she can’t be talking to the reader.  That’s just wrong.  She’s telling, not showing.”

Dave Freer at one time showed me excerpts of letters between C. S. Lewis and Tolkien, in which Tolkien told C. S. Lewis how much he disapproved of Narnia.

If you take your friend’s opinion, not yours, as the be all, end all of writing, you’ll end up perhaps not writing your Narnia, or leaving it unfinished.  It’s find to have friends and first readers – I do – but mix it up a little.  Not all of them are going to like everything you write, and some will hate a subgenre, a character, a voice with a flaming purple passion… and yet it might prove to be your most popular one.

With newbies in indie now, I’m seeing this desperate need to have someone validate that you’re a writer – and while understandable, that too can become an entanglement.

There’s a local press that does anthologies.  As far as I know they’re extremely reputable.  Back in pre-history, when I went through Kris and Dean’s course, one of the things they told me was to never ever ever sell to “pays in shared royalty” anthologies, because those never paid.  Also back in pre history – 11? years ago —  I broke that rule because a friend of a friend “needed” a story.  I gave them a trunk story.  The contract was strangely restrictive, being forever and all over the world, but this was a trunk story.  I’d never sold it, would never sell it, and what was I doing with it.  So I signed.  They’ve had the story out for a dozen years.  Periodically I get “statements.”  I have yet to see a thin dime for that story.  And of course, nowadays it means I can’t put it out in my own collections or ebooks.

This is sort of what I expect in those circumstances, now.  However, the local press is not like that.  I also gave them two stories, more than five years ago.  Again, trunk stories, again because a friend “needed” a story.

Their contracts are decent.  They’re well distributed at cons.  And – miracle of miracles – twice a year or so I get a check from them.  About enough for one take out pizza, but I suppose in time it will amount to normal pay for a short story. Also, their anthologies have got my story seen at cons (which seems to be their main avenue for distro) and has got me calls from editors looking for similar stories.

Not a bad investment for two trunk stories, right?  Nope, not a bad investment, and I’m glad I gave them those stories (which are, at any rate, non exclusive) but—

But I have beginning friends who seem to be mostly wrapped up in the press, writing for the press, editing for the press.  The press is the be al and end all of their endeavors.

It’s none of my business, of course, and if it makes them happy – but it risks turning into a whirlpool.  The press and the people involved are doing nothing wrong.  A lot of their writers also edit anthos.  It’s clearly giving them a lot of pleasure.

BUT if they’re relying on it exclusively and not doing their own thing as well – “self’ publishing, writing novels, even submitting novels traditionally – they are spending their entire capital – the effort and the time – on a venue that will never make them “professionals” – the definition in this case being “living from their writing.”

And this is why, for those who have asked, I still publish Indie and will publish Indie novels, even though I’m quite happy with Baen.

The mother of all entanglements in traditional publishing was agents and the – normally – sole publisher model.  It put you in a position where if your agent didn’t like your idea, it never even got sent out.  Or if you came up with an idea – say paranormal romance – that the one publisher your agent wanted you to be with (this system tended to mutually feed) didn’t publish/like, you couldn’t write it.

That’s control over your creative life you shouldn’t give anyone. Most of us learn by doing. Sometimes you need to write that paranormal romance to understand what you’re doing wrong with your mystery.  And sometimes you need to write the mystery to learn pacing for science fiction.  You shouldn’t give even the best publisher in the world control over that.  And you certainly shouldn’t give an agent control over that.  (Three of my agents refused to submit Darkship Thieves because it was “fluffy space opera without a big philosophical point.  The fourth only submitted it because the publisher demanded it, having seen it on the bar.)

It used to be difficult to keep your publisher (usually only one, and agents fought tooth and nail to keep you from having two) from being an entanglement.  It was even hard to keep your agent from dictating what you wrote and what turn your creativity took.

Now, it’s not.  You can go with multiple publishers or none.  You can go with two or three and self-publish on the side.  There’s no reason to limit yourself.  Your alphas don’t like it? Write it anyway.  Your publisher doesn’t like it?  Write it anyway.  You aren’t sure it’s any good?  What is stopping you from writing it and finding out.

You can always put it out under a pen name.  No one need know.  The future is wide open.  Cut that rope off your ankle and RUN.

23 Comments
  1. “Am I god enough?” Best typo yet.

    Yeah, I haven’t found a writing group yet, but I have collected some good betas. They point out problems, but don’t tell me how to fix them.

    July 17, 2013
    • Well, you have to train them. And then you can’t trust them, because half the time they’re wrong.
      Hey, on the typo, my keyboard has a limit on hitting the same letter within a certain space, to keep you from accidentally typing more than one letter. This is how so many books — not just mine — these days end up with god for good, al for all, etc.

      July 17, 2013
  2. I’m a firm believer in “fake it ’til you make it.” It’s worked well for me in several arenas so far. I don’t trust the concept of muse, and do trust the notion of hard, continuous work. But I haven’t worked out how to make words happen when they don’t show up on their own. I’m pretty sure it’s just a thingy in the brainy, but I don’t know what to do about it. Yet.

    July 17, 2013
    • You just do it. You sit down at a certain time, and put hands on keyboard and don’t let yourself up till x words are written or certain time reached. (Mine is the second.) Sometimes it still won’t work, but most of the time it will.

      July 17, 2013
      • Like I said: thingy in my brainy.

        July 17, 2013
  3. ABE #

    My parents are of the generation that says, ‘Never praise your child to her face – she’ll get a swelled head’ (swollen?).

    Massive self-doubt is the result.

    And it extends into every area of life. You fight it continuously. You don’t do it to your kids – and then you envy them.

    I keep pushing myself to dare to do things – and then I do them well.

    Maybe it will keep me modest (do I really do them well? should I remove myself from that competition? how can I expect anyone else to like this drivel? it’s too complicated for most readers…).

    Dunno – but I keep writing, keep blogging, keep singing, keep trying whatever new things I can within my limitations…

    Maybe that kind of upbringing also keeps you striving for something, anything, that will finally impress your parents. There is a lot to be said for being driven by demons.

    (This from a grown woman with a PhD in Nuclear Engineering.)

    Putting it into words and onto ‘paper’ doesn’t remove the sting.

    July 17, 2013
    • It does seem to help with the “driven.” In my case I grew up in the shadow of a much smarter brother, with parents who expected me to be mentally retarded (with reason.) It doesn’t get easier, does it?

      July 17, 2013
    • Problem is, I’ve internalized my mother’s criticism. I regularly denigrate things I’ve done, with her voice tones in my head. You’d think by now I’d have deprogrammed myself!

      July 17, 2013
  4. TXRed #

    I strongly suspect my entanglement with nonfiction publishers is why I’m doing everything indie. Project delayed by six months because of someone else’s running behind? Discovery that there’s another flaming hoop to jump through before the press will make up it’s mind yes/no? Sure, no problem, I’ll just sit here and seethe. And polish a novel to submit to NakedReader, and proof the next set of stories to go up this fall, and work on the series-that-was-to-end-last-book’s final book.

    July 17, 2013
  5. J.P. #

    How do you manage to do both traditional and indie with the ‘option on next novel length work’ clause? Is this clause one you refuse, or do you get them to add caveats to it? Or you only indie publish what a traditional publisher has first rejected?

    July 17, 2013
    • Nah. I have two series I’m doing for Baen. Three if you count Earth REvolution as a separate one. Their option is for SEQUELS. The rest is mine to play with. Though I’ll probably let them do webscription versions, anyway.

      July 17, 2013
      • J.P. #

        Ah. Good to know. Thank you.

        July 17, 2013
        • With decent publishers, you can get the option clause “limited”

          July 17, 2013
  6. I’ve evolved to be very suspicious of groups who want to have the option to talk you out of writing what you like. If I’d ever had a good opinion of them, that one writing class in college made me Nope right out of it. (I don’t remember that I personally had any problems. But I do remember asking a guy about his inverted pyramid under the sand and wanting to know if it was built that way or if it flipped somehow and what was the bottom like that was now the top and…? He didn’t like it much. Many of the other writers were boring to read/listen to. But since people seemed to enjoy most of the same stories I thought were boring, it could easily have just been my own personal tastes, not quality. And so I pretty much knew that sitting through something I didn’t enjoy just to get advice I didn’t trust and be polite about it all wasn’t for me.)

    Like the idea of writing friends still, though. You can make a lot of those and learn a lot from each other. Even if you’re not always a fan of everything they do. Much easier to get away from those who try to limit you when it’s a one-on-one sort of relationship.

    /ramble

    July 17, 2013
  7. Having finished my first novel (it’s running as a serial on Beyond the Far Horizon, a free site) I’ve found the best writer’s group of all.
    People who like your work write to you. Yeah, I get fan mail.
    It’s hard to get better support than that.

    July 17, 2013
  8. “Most of us were raised on the talent myth.”

    A few years in Hollywood spent writing and pitching screenplays will cure any writer of the talent myth. And I found the same kind of entanglements you describe in those years, too. When I wrote my first comedy, for instance, my agent (who didn’t really want me to write it in the first place) had to fight like mad to get anyone to read it, because I’d been pegged as “a sci-fi guy.” Then the comedy actually got some interest, and my agent had to fight to get the same people to read my next sci-fi spec, because I was now “a comedy guy.”

    July 18, 2013
    • Synova #

      I barely dipped my toes in script writing… bought some books… joined a critique group. We were doing pitch practice at one of the earlier meetings and I was doing my bit about… a mom and her five kids are hiking into a wilderness area as a last family event before her kids, the oldest are 18 and 20, all head their separate ways… and they find a crashed space craft with alien survivors… At some point I mention that the 18 year old daughter is leaving for Marine boot camp in 2 weeks and BAM! That was the end of that. To a *person* everyone wanted to know why the daughter would be planning on this most amazing career choice. I’m all… hello? aliens?….

      Sigh.

      No doubt I’d have learned something important eventually, but how can you relate to a group of people where each and everyone of them treats the girl wanting to be a Marine as an alien?

      July 19, 2013
      • Yeah — I never considered Hollywood. I grew up in a socialist/communist country. I know when an industry is infected.

        July 19, 2013
      • I hear you, Synova. Then again, that group sounds like good training for the real thing.

        July 20, 2013

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. These Are The Crazy Years | According To Hoyt

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: