See, here’s the thing about certain genres: disaster porn, adventure genres in general… there are good guys, there are bad guys (or at least natural disasters), and the relationship between them is a major part of the story. The opposition may even be accidental (oops) or offstage (long, long ago), but it kinda has to exist, and thus the story has to deal with it to some degree. Often it is the primary conflict of the story. And when the conventions are uncertain to the reader…
Sigh. I just read a book… (you know where this is going…) from an author (new to me). I picked it up casually (Kindle Unlimited) as a standalone (it seemed to be a one-off, or at least not labeled as #x of y, so I took it for a standalone and left it at that since I want to start with a first book in any series). For cheap loans/purchases, I don’t necessarily do a lot of research on an author — I let the blurb have its natural effect.
In prepping for this article I went back and checked. It turns out to be book #1 (at least I got that right) of a (wait for it) 168-book series. So far. Wish they’d put that on the cover.
Well, it’s gonna be the only one I read, and that’s a shame, because I could maybe have been acquired.
Let me explain the problem.
The basic premise is that there is an uncredited mysterious EMP disaster in the USA, and people have to deal with that. In this initial book, the heroes are a four-woman military squad just returned to a US base after a deployment. When the power goes, they jointly decide to desert (with reluctance) and separate to join/save their families, and they agree to rendezvous at the squad leader’s remote cabin, families in tow. Each of them has places to go, security to engage.
So far, so good. Basic chaos/fighting local baddies work follows for each of the four whom we track as independent threads. That part is well done and plausible enough.
Now, the whole time (the whole book), there is no focus on where the EMP came from, who the enemy is (or natural disaster), and so forth. As a reader, I’m OK with that, since we have no news sources broadcasting, so the suspense is plausible, as long as it’s dealt with at the end.
But now (in retrospect — wasn’t necessarily obvious when it started) the reader-retention problem begins. We begin to see that all is not just chaos and opportunistic mayhem. There is some sort of organization involved, either homegrown or something else. The members wear an affiliation mark — that’s all we know — and they’re on the side of collecting useful people for sinister or survival purposes.
Again… so far so good. All will no doubt be revealed later. But now… Well, they know, in their various locations, who the four heroines are, and where they come from. They know everything about them — background, skills, families, destinations, secret code words, etc. and they’re after them.
Short of time travel, fantasy, or other SFF props, this raises, um, questions in the mind of the reader. The reader has seen that no communications took place between the heroines after the adhoc in-person conversation to part and reconvene. In a time travel or magic context, the enemies could have managed to acquire this knowledge somehow, but as given? No. Not even the military that they deserted knows the explicit plans. There is no hint that there will be a genre shift to SFF (alien tech, time travel, etc.), so that’s out as an explanation.
So, heroine by heroine we are led thru the family rescue scenarios with unexpected (“the enemy knows everything you think is secret”) resistance difficulties. They are taunted with superior knowledge, and their morale is also targeted, with declarations that they are uniquely to be captured and thwarted, complete with knowledge of how they deserted in the first place, and all security knowledge about their hideaways.
I’m not saying that such a plot can’t be made plausible (or interesting). But it would require an SFF or similar framework (time travel, aliens,) or some sort of national security ruse/betrayal/war, none of which is in evidence (or an untrustworthy narrator). Add to this that (since I hadn’t noticed there were another 167 entries waiting in the wings), I was anticipating a reasonable ending scenario before running out of pages so I could go to sleep, and getting increasingly frustrated as it became clear that nothing like that was going to occur. 🙂
Now, I could skim the synopses for the remaining 100+ entries to take the sting out of this to talk myself into continuing, or I could turn it into an object lesson.
It’s on me that I didn’t notice this was first in an interminable series, but surely the author might provide a buyer clue in his ad, like a book-number.
More importantly, the author is responsible for the reader frustration when he inserts un-explained capabilities to make tight chase scenes more perilous (“Oh, no! They know where that secure location is, too!”) Once or twice raises tension. Many times implies facts not in evidence, and those should either be eventually (and I mean in the same book) accounted for or reasonably (however referenced) postponed to “temporary mystery” status appropriate to the genre conventions.
My reader experience as more and more liberties were taken with un-earned enemy knowledge is not the sort of thing that endears you to readers. It’s not that I needed all doubts settled — even one peek into mysteries/missing likelihoods would have removed the feeling of being taken advantage of. One doesn’t need answers, necessarily, but one doesn’t want arbitrary action, either.
[I’ve caved, and glanced at the blurbs of some of the 167 other entries. It’s not clear that they involve the same incident as this first book, though that’s my assumption. Each one seems to be set up as a new character/s in a different location reacting to an EMP event. Is it the same EMP event as the first book with its unexplained villains? Who knows? I won’t be finding out. What could be better than engaging in that suspense for 167 more books, with no promise of answers even then? (OK – I cheated. I checked the blurb for the last (so far) book 168. It’s no different. I also peeked at the reviews. It seems clear that each book is envisioned as a stand-alone with different characters, that is, there is no obvious evidence of any evolving external series story of EMP cause or reaction, just 168 stories of emergency reaction by local heroes. So… no explanations about mysterious causes, mysterious character knowledge by enemies, etc. Just an ongoing (open-ended from the point of view of overall story closure) fictional set of handbook entries for what to do in such an emergency. Who needs 168 of those in the same world? (But who am I to argue…he obviously has an audience.)]
Yeah, I’m cranky about this one. But, hey, it also teaches me a lesson about being careful about what my own readers would reasonably expect, especially for a first-in-series. Don’t leave your own readers frustrated… set their expectations appropriately for continuation.





8 responses to “Facts not in evidence”
This ‘who knows what’ problem did rear it’s head for me when I started on Unfair Advantage, waaaay back at the beginning. It can become complicated to keep track of what character has what knowledge of the situation, and it can be a pain to keep explaining the same thing over and over.
In my books the Valkyrie robots are all on the same network, so they all know what one of them knows. Immediately.
The humans an assorted others have to be updated, usually by a Valkyrie, an ear bud, a HUD, a helmet speaker, some form of communication device to spread the word. So you see characters pausing with a hand to their ear, and then reacting to the news.
Battlespace HUDs are handy too, then the characters can have knowledge from remote locations and act on it in a timely manner without a bunch of exposition. It makes teamwork and superior firepower less straining on the suspension of disbelief. If ‘Character’ is super-badass in the Mobile Infantry suit and always where they need to be with that big gun, the reader has a reasonable explanation why that is. ‘Character’ is using the technology skillfully. They’re good at MI suits, and they’re using data from lots of locations.
So and so character is awesome “because they’re just that awesome” is kind of lame after a while. Empress whatsherface type of thing. They should be awesome because they earned it.
And the frustrating bit is, with 167 entries, it must be selling!
With a long series, or stories in the same setting, trying to not give too many repeats of what happened earlier is also an issue. But . . . you’ve got to at least hint.
An all-knowing enemy, without explanation would have me pissed.
Well, with knowledge of an EMP strike (natural or otherwise) there are ways to protect some of the infrastructure, Faraday bags, etc. So, once the strike happens, anything that has been protected is usable again. It’s not like a jammer. So, if the bad guys knew, prepared and then waited till it was safe, then they are back in business. But, Yeah, 167 books is a bit excessive for no one to be figuring out.
168?! Good grief. I do not have time for that.
Well, that’s the way to handle a long series. Have a setting, and let different adventures happen there.
BUT — don’t do anything that would change the setting in a drastic way, and don’t tease such a thing.
Yeah, the first book ought to have at least hinted, and the responsible parties dealt with by the third. A third group that saved some tech and are using it could be brought in later if needed.
That’s a different sort of series — a rebuilding the world series. With the logical terminus of its being rebuilt. (I suppose, given the scale of its objective, it could go endlessly. But it would take delicate handling to balance this improvement and that with the need to start the next tale with a deficiency.)
At least S. M. Sterling had the disaster in one series, and the “oops, did we do that?” in a second series, so readers could find out what caused the tech collapse in Series A if they read at least the first book in Series B. And then he went forward, with the world developing as characters explored and grew.