The purpose of the cover is to sell the book. Fonts and layout are part of that. There are a few hard and fast rules, including not using dark red on black, don’t use interior fonts (Times New Roman) on a cover, don’t use something that cannot be read.* Considering how the cover will look when shrunk into a thumbnail on an electronic book sale site is also important. The rest of the rules change over time, and vary with genre, with which country you are selling in**, subgenre, and copyright. Too, you want to beware of blending in too well, which is what is happening with a number of trad-pub histories of the American Revolution right now***.
So, when can you break the rules? When you know what they are, and you are aiming at a very specific readership, and you are willing to take a leap.

If you look at the cover in thumbnail, it appears to be a chick-lit or women’s fiction book, based on the colors and the font. It would blend in on those shelves in the fiction section. It is eye-catching in nonfiction, because right now, medieval history leans toward images related to the subject of the book (portrait, representative image from art, artifact from the time), with serif fonts, generally in a three-color pattern aside from paintings. This one stood out like a Great Dane at a cat show.
The publisher took a risk, because the book is non-fiction, but it is not just medieval cultural history. It is a study of what medieval writers said about the Seven Deadly (Mortal) Sins, how that differs from modern interpretations, and how the medieval ideas apply to modern people. The author uses his own experiences as examples of the Big Seven, and uses that to frame the chapters in the book. So it is history, it is theology, but it is also self-help and autobiography as well. Which element should be emphasized in order to attract eyes and buyers?
The publisher chose to play up the modern chatty, self-help side of the book. By using that font and color combination, the title stands out from other history titles. It also stands out if the book is put into Christian Non-Fiction, and self-help. However, it is not too modern, because of the small illustrations taken from manuscripts that illustrate some of the Big Seven.
It worked. When I took the book with me to a medical appointment, several women asked about it, and took photos of the cover. One said she’d talk to her book club about reading it. The publisher achieved his goal. The cover got eyes on the book, and people talking about it, and potentially interested in reading it.
So, what’s the lesson for us fiction writers? First, focus your cover design on the most important or most-likely-to-sell aspect of your book. This cover won’t interest someone looking for serious scholarship and translations of the Desert Fathers or later writers. Two, know the fonts, color combos, and design elements currently being used in the genre and sub-genre you are focusing on. Three, if you are being different, temper that difference enough that you don’t turn away potential readers. The subtitle was enough to make me pick up the book and thumb through it, then glance at the bibliography.
Being strange can work, IF you do it right, with care for your market.
*There are metal bands with logos so intricate that I can’t tell what the name of the group is. Not a good way to sell books to new readers.
**What is sci-fi in the US is not the same in France, and what says “historical fiction” in Germany is quite different from in the United States.
***All use the same fonts on the cover, all have the same layout, all use a battle scene or cropped image of the signing of the Declaration of Independence at the bottom of the cover. When three or more are lined up, I can’t remember which one is which.





8 responses to “Of Fonts, Covers, and Markets”
Heraldry supposedly classed white and yellow as metals (they were originally stand ins for silver and gold) versus the actual colors of red, purple blue and green, and says that you don’t put metal on metal or color on color. (For sale of contrast and legibility in battle). Similarly today it’s unwise to put pale text on pale background and dark text on dark background.
Makes me wonder if following heraldry rules would make for good covers.
I don’t know if there are many others that would translate to covers. Coats of arms are much addicted to busy-ness, although arguably it’s because so many of them are “crossovers” between different, intermarried families’ emblems!
Quarterings got absurd precisely as their battlefield use fell away.
True!
It would help, because they have many of the same aims. However, the instant identification of heraldry strictly limited the colors. You can use a lot more on a cover if you use them right.
I analyzed LitRPG covers and found what they all had in common: Weapon, Something that Glows(*), Monster, Color, Not Photo-realistic.
Font is trickier. It’s usually a narrow serif font, which are hard to find. Headline fonts these days seem to be mostly sans-serif. I’m still looking for one and I hate every moment of it. While I know it’s important, it’s something I don’t care about at all.
I screenshot Amazon recommendation covers then drop my attempts into the set to see how they compare.
I use Stable Diffusion to crank out a thousand cover images every couple of weeks. Out of each batch, there are about five contenders. I use the sane rejects as “featured image”s on book related blog posts.
(*) This raises the “illustrate” vs “represent” issue. There is nothing glowy in the book. There will be glowy things in book 2 and I will happily put them on the cover. For book 1, I think adding glowy things on the cover is somewhat misleading.
I will add a caveat: You can use interior fonts, if you integrate them into the artwork.
If your cover shows an open book, and you work the title and byline into the text such that the reader can distinguish them, you will use an interior font.
But that’s tricky.